Insights / Case studies
Case study

$41M in Inpatient Revenue That Criteria Alone Would Have Missed

A six-month look at 8,766 hospital accounts found that more than 1 in 4 accounts paid as inpatient never met InterQual or MCG inpatient criteria.

At a glance

SettingMultiple acute care hospitals

Study windowOct 2024 – Mar 2025

Accounts8,766 reviewed; 6,241 paid as inpatient

PayersCommercial, Medicare Advantage, Medicaid Advantage

Criteria testedInterQual and MCG

ExcludedObstetric, psychiatric, elective surgical

28%

of inpatient-paid accounts didn't meet traditional inpatient criteria

$41M

more than those accounts would have paid as observation, in six months

$82M

annualized differential across the hospitals studied

The challenge

Most UM programs treat InterQual and MCG as the finish line: meet criteria and it's inpatient, miss and it drifts to observation. But criteria are guidelines, not a medical necessity determination, and both vendors earn most of their criteria revenue from payers.

The approach

Long Tail pulled every account its physician advisors reviewed over six months and compared two things: whether the case met inpatient criteria, and how the payer actually paid it.

The results

1,726 of 6,241 inpatient-paid accounts never met inpatient criteria. Payers paid them as inpatient anyway, because the clinical record supported the admission.

Criteria not met, by payer type

Commercial
31%
Medicare Advantage
28%
Medicaid Advantage
22%

Share of inpatient-paid accounts that did not meet inpatient criteria, Oct 2024 – Mar 2025.

As inpatient, those accounts paid $48M. As observation, they'd have paid about $7M. That $41M gap is 28% of everything insurers paid for this population.

What the 1,726 accounts paid

Paid as inpatient
$48M
If paid as observation
~$7M
The gap
$41M
What it means for your health system

Criteria are where review starts, not where it ends. The cases outside criteria are where physician advisor judgment pays for itself, and a process that stops at the checklist hands that revenue to the payer.

Take the full case study to your team

The PDF with the full numbers and methodology.

Download the PDF

What's sitting outside criteria at your health system?

Go look at your own numbers.

Methodology: retrospective validation study. "Paid in full" = at least 80% of expected reimbursement or a gross collection rate above 30%. Observation estimate uses an average of $4,083 per account. Annualized figure is a straight-line extension of the six-month window. Results reflect the hospitals studied; validation across additional systems and payer mixes is ongoing.